[PATCH] lpc32xx/clock: Use && instead of &
Wolfram Sang
w.sang at pengutronix.de
Tue Aug 10 10:48:52 EDT 2010
Because we are connecting two expressions here, not binary values.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang at pengutronix.de>
Cc: Kevin Wells <wellsk40 at gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/clock.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/clock.c
index 32d6379..9ff1438 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/clock.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int local_usbpll_enable(struct clk *clk, int enable)
__raw_writel(reg, LPC32XX_CLKPWR_USB_CTRL);
/* Wait for PLL lock */
- while ((timeout > jiffies) & (ret == -ENODEV)) {
+ while ((timeout > jiffies) && (ret == -ENODEV)) {
reg = __raw_readl(LPC32XX_CLKPWR_USB_CTRL);
if (reg & LPC32XX_CLKPWR_USBCTRL_PLL_STS)
ret = 0;
--
1.7.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list