Merge request of s5pc210 universal board.

[Kyungmin Park]

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com> wrote:
>> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark at infradead.org>
>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>> >> Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Dear all,
>>> >>>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >>> Now I checked the next-v310 tree and know that only LSI required codes
>>> >>> are merged.
>>> >>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-
>>> >>> samsung.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next-s5pv310
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I can't find any reason to omit the universal board file. It's posted
>>> >>> before merge window and no difference with LSI SMDK board at current
>>> >>> status.
>>> >>
>>> >> Please answer my concern..I already replied to you about this.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-July/022087.html
>>> >> ---
>>> >>> >> +config MACH_UNIVERSAL
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > As I still asking, do you _really_ want to use 'UNIVERSAL' as the
>>> >>> > board(machine) name?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Yes, it's called 'universal' and it's really universal board at here.
>>> >>> I don't confuse the engineer who develop this board.
>>> >>> Maybe your engineers saw and hear the brief description about
>> universal
>>> >> board.
>>> >>>
>>> >> Actually, I know that. But there are S5PC100, S5PC110 universal board
>>> >> also...
>>> >> So I asked to you that you _really_ want to use 'universal' here...and
>> I'm
>>> >> still concerning.
>>> >
>>> > No comment means "Of course want to merge it". thank you for your
>>> > concerning. but I can handle it.
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> After discuss with Mr. Kim. I changed to use non-generic name to
>> universal_c210.
>>>
>> Thanks for your understanding...IMHO, 'MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210' is quite long...
>> If you don't mind, how about 'MACH_UNI_C210' or 'MACH_UNIC210'...but it
>> depends on your decision.
>
> FYI: These are also candidates but my team voted and decide to use it.
>
>>
>>> Then do you resend the patch? or can you handle it by yourself?
>>>
>> I will apply this with changing it.
Please modify the machine ID only. I want to use the universal prefix
at variables as is.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> Thanks
>>
>>> To Russell.
>>> Sorry for bothering you.
>>> Can you change the registered universal to universal_c210?
>>> universal_c210          MACH_UNIVERSAL_C210     UNIVERSAL_C210

>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kyungmin Park
>>> >
>>> >> ---
>>> >>
>>> >>> I try to support our board at mainline kernel but it seems to make a
>>> >>> difficult with unknown commit criteria of LSI.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kgene.
>> --
>> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
>> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>>
>>
>