Samsung S3C6410 mainline merge coordination
laforge at gnumonks.org
Wed Sep 2 18:30:37 EDT 2009
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> Harald> === NAND ===
> Harald> * mainline currently uses same driver for s3c24xx and s3c64xx
> Harald> ** samsung uses a new driver for 2450, 6400, 6410 (and later)
> Harald> * does it make sense to extend the mainline driver with new SoC support
> Harald> or should we rather split the mainline driver?
> The nand controllers in the different variants are afaik very similar,
> that's why I added 64xx support to s3c2410.c. What would a split gain
That's the question the respective developers at Samsung should respond to (see
Cc) Why do you think a split of the nand driver is required? Please comment.
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel