My first patch to the mailist, but being held

[Wan ZongShun]

Dear Eric,


2009/9/1 Eric Miao <eric.y.miao at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Wan ZongShun<mcuos.com at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear David,
>>
>> 2009/9/1 David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>:
>>> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 22:05 +0800, Wan ZongShun wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think so too, due to I never meet this type 'held' in LAKML and
>>>> LKML, so I am amazed at this 'held' in the list.
>>>
>>> Not all of the mailman settings were imported from the old list to the
>>> new one. If the moderators want to increase the size limit, they are
>>> free to do that -- the hardware can certainly cope.
>>>
>>> But Eric is right that patches above 40KiB are fairly suspect anyway --
>>> why is it so large?
>>
>> The patch is one of the series patches of changing my w90x900 platform
>> architecture, originally, I submitted nine patches to mend my
>> platform, Russell has reviewed them and
>> hoped me to re-arrange the patches, so I Integrated the nine patches
>> into three ones.
>>
>> I just ignore the size of patch issue.
>>
>
> You can try 'git format-patch -M' to shrink the size of the patch significantly
> if renaming is involved.
>

I have done this, thanks.



-- 
Wan z.s