MXC MMC driver and SDIO peripherals

Daniel Mack daniel at caiaq.de
Wed Oct 28 13:21:47 EDT 2009


On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:11:04AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:47 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > I did some more research on this and it turns out that the problem is
> > related to multi block transfers. At least, this is when it first
> > occurs.
> > 
> > The libertas SDIO driver downloads two firmwares to the device, one
> > 'helper' and one 'real' firmware The first one only uses chunks of 64
> > bytes each and that seems to work fine. The real firmware, however,
> > loads in 512 bytes chunks which the SDIO core breaks up into 16 blocks
> > of 32 bytes. And this is where the MXC host controller bails out with a
> > CRC error. Unfortunately, it does not give any more detailed information
> > about what exactly went wrong.
> > 
> > The effect might be related to an errata entry[1], which is what I'm
> > currently investigating. To do so, I would like to limit the the
> > communication to singe-block transfers, just to exclude all other
> > possible (electrical, clock speed, ...) issues. I did that by setting
> > mmc->max_blk_count to 1 in the the host controller, but then again,
> > the libertas driver and/or the firmware doesn't like that and dies in
> > if_sdio_pro_real() with
> > 
> >   firmware wants 17 bytes
> >   firmware helper signalled error
> > 
> > Any idea how to get that working with only single block small transfers?
> 
> Just a note; single-block transfers will probably kill your wifi
> performance, especially if the errata are true.  When the libertas
> driver sends network data packets it sends them with
> 
> 		ret = sdio_writesb(card->func, card->ioport,
> 				packet->buffer, packet->nb);
> 
> so if your packet is normal ethernet 1500 bytes, breaking that up in to
> 47 single block transfers of 32-bytes each is going to be slow...

Yep, I know. Thats's a disaster, especially without DMA enabled (which
is currently the case).

But I'd like to see it working somehow first and then see whether that's
really the issue :)

Daniel




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list