staging/dream: add gpio and pmem support

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 09:19:21AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-10-26 20:00:39, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 01:17:03AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > > This adds generic_gpio and pmem support, both are needed for other
> > > > > dream drivers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>
> > > > 
> > > > I'd prefer to get the existing code building, before adding new stuff :(
> > > 
> > > Well, unfortunately other pieces depend on these.
> > 
> > The pieces already in the tree? 
> 
> Yes :-(.
> 
> > Why are you sending me patches that do
> > not build?
> 
> I did not realize how much was those drivers depenend on arch-specific part.
> 
> > > I have it building with this patch (but note that it uses -I magic; I
> > > started to write script rewriting files so that -I is not neccessary,
> > > but I did not have time to finish it yet).
> > 
> > Ok, should I just delete the whole drivers/staging/dream/ directory as
> > there seems no goal to get this to build properly?  I've just marked the
> > code as BROKEN, any chance to get it building again soon?
> 
> Could we perhaps use -I to let it build before I find time to do
> search&replace of 100 #includes? Yes, I'm working on that, but no, it
> obviously does not progress as fast as I expected...
> 
> 								Pavel
> 
> Add missing files/includes neccessary for Dream compilation.
>     
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>

Ick, no.  I'm not going to take the wakelock and other header files that
are "generic" to android into the dream subdir.  That's not ok.

If this code requires this mess to build, I think we should just delete
the whole thing and start over with patches that add code that can
actually build properly.

Any objection to that?

thanks,

greg k-h