i.MX31 kernel panic and irq
Wolf, Rene, HRO-GP
rene.wolf at mbda-systems.de
Thu Oct 8 04:16:59 EDT 2009
Hi @all.
@Bill
> Well, "random" when you have limited information. :)
You're right of course :-)
> I wonder how it fares at 1kHz?
Results from 1kHz:
20 min. and running ...
Also did produce some load: make on small project +
top over ssh with d=0.1. Went without crash.
> Boy, I sure hope you don't also need a predictable interrupt latency.
> It sounds like the system will definitely fall behind during those
> bursts.
Well.... sort of. But I failed to mention, that this project is also an
investigation on how fast / good the planned stuff works. So if the
result is, that it's reliable only with a pre-divider (of, say 512 ->
200kHz/512) well then that's the result :-)
I was really wondering about the kernel panic. Coz for being a non
real time system (I didn't change anything in that direction on my kernel)
I would have expected it to 'randomly' (on load situations) miss IRQs
but not crash the kernel?
@Russell
> The question, therefore, is why r5 would be corrupted.
Is that something I could have broken with some sort of '.config' switch?
Thanks for your help :-)
Cheers
Rene
Rene Wolf
LFK-Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH
Human Resources Operations & Policy, HRO
Landshuter Straße 26, 85716 Unterschleißheim, GERMANY
Phone: +49 89 3179 8337
Fax: +49 8252 99 8964
E-Mail: rene.wolf at mbda-systems.de
http://www.mbda.net
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Antoine Bouvier
Managing Director: Werner Kaltenegger
Registered Office: Schrobenhausen
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Ingolstadt, HRB 4365
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list