[RFC PATCH 05/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: wrap soc_pcmcia_socket to contain sa1111 specific data

[Kristoffer Ericson]

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 00:14:02 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 06:01:40PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Russell King wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel at arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.c       |   19 +++++++----
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_base.h       |    3 ++
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_lubbock.c    |   10 ++++--
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_badge4.c     |    7 ++++-
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_jornada720.c |   20 ++++++++----
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_neponset.c   |    9 ++++-
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa1111_generic.c    |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa1111_generic.h    |   14 ++++++++
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.c       |   21 ++++++++----
> > >  drivers/pcmcia/sa11xx_base.h       |    2 +
> > >  10 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > 
> > What tree is this patch for? I get the following errors when applying
> > to taday's pull of Linus's tree (git describe is
> > v2.6.32-rc1-384-ga99bbaf):
> > 
> > patching file drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_jornada720.c
> > Hunk #1 FAILED at 24.
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 40.
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 85.
> > Hunk #4 FAILED at 101.
> > 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file
> > drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_jornada720.c
> 
> Guess that's because 5690/1 was been applied behind my back.  I'll see
> about rebasing the patch and discarding 5690 from the patch system.

My bad, it sent an updated version to linux-pcmcia while
forgetting to CC arm. Also totally forgot that I still had it
pending inside linux-arm patch tracker.

Sorry

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>