[PATCH 1/8] omap2: mux: intoduce omap_mux_{read,write}
Shilimkar, Santosh
santosh.shilimkar at ti.com
Sun Nov 29 05:03:27 EST 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:49 AM
> To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; Mike Rapoport
> Subject: [PATCH 1/8] omap2: mux: intoduce omap_mux_{read,write}
>
> From: Mike Rapoport <mike at compulab.co.il>
>
> intoduce omap_mux_{read,write}
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike at compulab.co.il>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 44
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
> index c18a94e..64250c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,27 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
>
> +#define OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET 0x30 /* Offset from CTRL_BASE
> */
> +#define OMAP_MUX_BASE_SZ 0x5ca
> +
> static struct omap_mux_cfg arch_mux_cfg;
> +static void __iomem *mux_base;
> +
> +static inline u16 omap_mux_read(u16 reg)
> +{
> + if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> + return __raw_readb(mux_base + reg);
> + else
> + return __raw_readw(mux_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void omap_mux_write(u16 val, u16 reg)
> +{
> + if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> + __raw_writeb(val, mux_base + reg);
This will work on board but the code relies on underneath function typecast here. OMAP24xx reg write suppose to be 8 bit and __raw_writeb will take care of this with forced typecast.
> + else
> + __raw_writew(val, mux_base + reg);
> +}
>
> /* NOTE: See mux.h for the enumeration */
>
> @@ -581,10 +601,7 @@ static void __init_or_module
> omap2_cfg_debug(const struct pin_config *cfg, u16 r
> u16 orig;
> u8 warn = 0, debug = 0;
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> - orig = omap_ctrl_readb(cfg->mux_reg);
> - else
> - orig = omap_ctrl_readw(cfg->mux_reg);
> + orig = omap_mux_read(cfg->mux_reg - OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX_DEBUG
> debug = cfg->debug;
> @@ -614,7 +631,7 @@ static int __init_or_module
> omap24xx_cfg_reg(const struct pin_config *cfg)
> if (cfg->pu_pd_val)
> reg |= OMAP2_PULL_UP;
> omap2_cfg_debug(cfg, reg);
> - omap_ctrl_writeb(reg, cfg->mux_reg);
> + omap_mux_write(reg, cfg->mux_reg - OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mux_spin_lock, flags);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -633,7 +650,7 @@ static int __init_or_module
> omap34xx_cfg_reg(const struct pin_config *cfg)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&mux_spin_lock, flags);
> reg |= cfg->mux_val;
> omap2_cfg_debug(cfg, reg);
> - omap_ctrl_writew(reg, cfg->mux_reg);
> + omap_mux_write(reg, cfg->mux_reg - OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mux_spin_lock, flags);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -644,6 +661,21 @@ static int __init_or_module
> omap34xx_cfg_reg(const struct pin_config *cfg)
>
> int __init omap2_mux_init(void)
> {
> + u32 mux_pbase;
> +
> + if (cpu_is_omap2420())
> + mux_pbase = OMAP2420_CTRL_BASE + OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET;
> + else if (cpu_is_omap2430())
> + mux_pbase = OMAP243X_CTRL_BASE + OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET;
> + else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
> + mux_pbase = OMAP343X_CTRL_BASE + OMAP_MUX_BASE_OFFSET;
> +
> + mux_base = ioremap(mux_pbase, OMAP_MUX_BASE_SZ);
The control modules on OMAP's divided into 2 domains with different base address
1. pads in CORE power domain
2. Pads in wakeup domain.
If we map these two separately, then we can differentiate the wakeup capable pads.
Not sure whether I am making any sense here but just thought it would be useful.
> + if (!mux_base) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "mux: Could not ioremap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
> arch_mux_cfg.pins = omap24xx_pins;
> arch_mux_cfg.size = OMAP24XX_PINS_SZ;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list