[PATCH 06/12] imx-ssi sound driver
Timur Tabi
timur at freescale.com
Sat Nov 28 14:53:30 EST 2009
Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Mainly because I wasn't aware of the fact that the fsl driver is the
> same:(
So "fsl-ssi.c" was not a clue? :-)
>
> I'm currently looking if and how the code can be merged. I don't know if
> it's worth it though since the common code doesn't seem to be very big.
That's probably because my driver only supports I2S and yours supports AC97.
Please, DMA is different. I wasn't really expecting you to be able to re-use
my driver, but I figured you could at least re-use the macros I've defined in
fsl-ssi.h
> There will have to be some changes in the fsl-ssi driver. For example I
> need the irq handler for my fiq handler which means that the fsl-ssi
> driver is not allowed to request the irq for it's statistic.
That shouldn't be a problem, since the statistics never show anything useful
anyway.
> The other
> thing is the hardware accesses as we do not have in_be*, out_be* and
> setbits/clrbits. Of course all these things are doable and shouldn't be
> a showstopper.
These should be defined in the arch/arm header files anyway.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list