[PATCH 3/6] gta02: set pcf50633 charger_reference_current_ma
pavel at ucw.cz
Fri Nov 13 13:26:21 EST 2009
On Thu 2009-11-12 21:59:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:40:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2009-11-11 18:31:43, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 04:48:44PM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Ben, please give us an advice on how to proceed with this rather
> > > > trivial patch. Anton doesn't merge the other patches from this series
> > > > because we do not know via which tree to merge this particular patch.
> > >
> > > Paul, I'll just merge the whole patch set but skip this particular
> > > patch.
> > Feel free to merge that patch, too. It is clearly related to the
> > other stuff, and Russell being totally unresponsive should not be
> > reason to block patches.
> > He is the maintainer, he was cc-ed, and at this point it is quite
> > clear that he does not care.
> Err, WTF? How do you come to the conclusion that I'm somehow related
> to Samsung stuff, or GTA03 stuff? Oh, that's right, you don't let facts
> get in the way of blaming me for something.
Ok, you are right, Ben is listed as Samsung maintainer. Accept my
apologies. The rest stands: Anton should just take the patch, because
maintainer does not care.
Actually, given that Ben is unresponsive, it should be either you or
Anton taking the patch; so if you prefer, you can take it.
> I've been ignoring this because as far as I can see, it's got nothing
> to do with me, and therefore its pointless me acking it.
> Really Pavel, just take a moment to get your facts straight before you
> start blaming people.
Now, you still are arm maintainer, and that includes arch-msm. There's
nice series in your inbox for week+ -- HTC Dream support. There's also
Daniel Walker who is willing to maintain the architecture. Can we get
the patches applied (or some other decision?). Pavel
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel