[PATCH] [ARM] Kirkwood: Prevent kernel from crashing if PCIe bridge?is present
Alexander Clouter
alex at digriz.org.uk
Thu Nov 12 10:42:49 EST 2009
Dieter Kiermaier <dk-arm-linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> static int __init openrd_base_pci_init(void)
> {
> + u32 cpu_config_reg;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + base = ioremap(0xf1020100, 4);
>
Ewwwwwwww. :)
If you dig through arch/arm/mach-orion5x/include/mach/orion5x.h you
should be able to work out that 0xf1020100 is probably best replaced
with something like (ORION5X_BRIDGE_PHYS_BASE | 0x100), once you add
a matching ORION5X_BRIDGE_PHYS_BASE entry alongside the
ORION5X_BRIDGE_VIRT_BASE[1]. Well, *I* prefer that sort of thing. :)
> + if (base)
> + {
> + cpu_config_reg = readl(base);
> + cpu_config_reg &= ~(1 << 2);
> + writel(cpu_config_reg, base);
> + }
> + iounmap(base);
> +
> if (machine_is_openrd_base())
> kirkwood_pcie_init();
> -
> return 0;
> }
> subsys_initcall(openrd_base_pci_init);
>
As was recently explained to me[2], that code is going to run on *all*
kirkword platforms, not just the OpenRD. I am guessing you want to
shove your additional code into a seperate int returning __init function
and call it from the machine_is_openrd_base() clause.
Also, if for some strange reason the ioremap() failed, you are going to
call iounmap(NULL) so that should probably be moved up a line into the
'if' clause? However on this one I *think* I have been told in the past
it cannot fail so you might be able to remove the 'if' clause
altogether.
Cheers
[1] unsure if at that point can can just jump straight in and tinker with
ORION5X_BRIDGE_VIRT_BASE?
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-October/002699.html
--
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: Most people's favorite way to end a game is by winning.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list