[PATCH] Fix PXA-27x/3xx interrupts when CONFIG_PXA_HAVE_ISA_IRQS=y
Haojian Zhuang
haojian.zhuang at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 21:27:34 EST 2009
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Marc Zyngier <maz at misterjones.org> wrote:
>
> Commit d2c37068429b29d6549cf3486fc84b836689e122 ([ARM] pxa:
> initialize default interrupt priority and use ICHP for IRQ handling)
> broke ISA interrupt support on PXA-27x/3xx.
>
> In such a case, PXA_IRQ(0) != 0, and the IRQ number computed from
> ICHP must be offset by PXA_IRQ(0).
>
> Tested on an Arcom Zeus (PXA-270).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at misterjones.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/entry-macro.S | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/entry-macro.S b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> index 2418806..f7eb9d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> @@ -46,5 +46,8 @@
> beq 1001f
> bic \irqstat, \irqstat, #0x80000000
> mov \irqnr, \irqstat, lsr #16
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PXA_HAVE_ISA_IRQS
> + add \irqnr, \irqnr, #(PXA_IRQ(0))
> +#endif
> 1001:
> .endm
> --
> 1.6.0.4
Hi Marc,
I have a question on this. Do you use CONFIG_PXA_HAVE_ISA_IRQS in
pxa270? In my patch, I only enable interrupt priority in pxa27x and
pxa3xx since silicon can support this feature. And this feature isn't
supported by pxa25x.
I also find that CONFIG_PXA_HAVE_ISA_IRQS is only used in pxa25x. Is
it right? So I think that we needn't add this into pxa27x and pxa3xx.
What's your opinion?
Thanks
Haojian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list