[PATCH] ARM: NUC900: Fix bugs of clocksource driver
Wan ZongShun
mcuos.com at gmail.com
Wed Dec 23 03:57:03 EST 2009
Hi Li Jie,
Great! I have a comment below.
2009/12/23 Li Jie <eltshanli at gmail.com>:
> Hi Wan:
>
> This patch fix following bugs of clocksource in nuc900 cpus:
>
> 1. Enable timer1 before call clocksource_register(...)
> 2. change mask, 32 -> 24, because the max value of TDR1 is 0xFFFFFF
> 3. change shift. 20 -> 10, 20 is too big caused mult overflow
>
>
> Signed-off-by: lijie <eltshanli at gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-w90x900/time.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/time.c
> index 4128af8..b80e508 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/time.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@
> #define TICKS_PER_SEC 100
> #define PRESCALE 0x63 /* Divider = prescale + 1 */
>
> +#define TDR_SHIFT 24
> +#define TDR_MASK ((1 << TDR_SHIFT) - 1)
> +
> +#define TIMER1_CLKEN (1 << 20)
> unsigned int timer0_load;
>
> static void nuc900_clockevent_setmode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> @@ -110,6 +114,7 @@ static struct irqaction nuc900_timer0_irq = {
> .name = "nuc900-timer0",
> .flags = IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
> .handler = nuc900_timer0_interrupt,
> + .dev_id = &nuc900_clockevent_device,
> };
>
> static void __init nuc900_clockevents_init(unsigned int rate)
> @@ -127,15 +132,15 @@ static void __init
> nuc900_clockevents_init(unsigned int rate)
>
> static cycle_t nuc900_get_cycles(struct clocksource *cs)
> {
> - return ~__raw_readl(REG_TDR1);
> + return (~__raw_readl(REG_TDR1)) & TDR_MASK;
> }
>
> static struct clocksource clocksource_nuc900 = {
> .name = "nuc900-timer1",
> .rating = 200,
> .read = nuc900_get_cycles,
> - .mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32),
> - .shift = 20,
> + .mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(TDR_SHIFT),
> + .shift = 10,
> .flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
> };
>
> @@ -143,10 +148,15 @@ static void __init
> nuc900_clocksource_init(unsigned int rate)
> {
> unsigned int val;
>
> + /* enable timer1 clk */
> + val = __raw_readl(W90X900_VA_CLKPWR);
> + val |= TIMER1_CLKEN;
> + __raw_writel(val, W90X900_VA_CLKPWR);
> +
I think it is better of the action of enabling timer1 should call the
clk_get and clk_enable APIs.
Hmm, I see,this timer0-4 enabled APIs have not been implmented yet
,and please wait me for
this patch later this night, then make your v2 patch relative to my patch.
> __raw_writel(0xffffffff, REG_TICR1);
>
> val = __raw_readl(REG_TCSR1);
> - val |= (COUNTEN | PERIOD);
> + val |= (COUNTEN | PERIOD | PRESCALE);
> __raw_writel(val, REG_TCSR1);
>
> clocksource_nuc900.mult =
> --
> 1.6.5.4
>
--
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list