[PATCH 2/4] mfd: mc13783: When probing, unlock the mc13783 before subsystems initialisation.
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Sun Dec 20 13:49:42 EST 2009
Hi Alberto,
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 02:48:38PM +0100, Alberto Panizzo wrote:
> > > PATCH 1 & 2 are fixes that can go to .33
> > I don't like patch 1. I'd prefer that drivers touching
> > MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS are aware of the bit in question and
> > wouldn't rely on mc13783-core.
>
> Yes, but MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS contains bit that control
> different aspect of mc13783 chip.
> GPO are regulator related, but those two bits in question maybe
> apply to a power management driver, so this problem is a matter
> of mc13783-core.
maybe?
> Another possible solution, is to trace the writings to those two bits
> in mc13783_reg_rmw storing the value written an reproducing it in next
> mc13783_reg_rmw calls.
> But the problem for this is that we don't know if the bootloader
> had initialised those with another non default value.
> Another problem is that if another driver make use of
> mc13783_reg_write for modifying those bits, the state stored will
> be inconsistent.
The next best thing I would consider acceptable are dedicated functions
for MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS. I havn't checked what the register
in question is used for, but I think the bootloader isn't generally a
problem as Linux shouldn't rely on things setup by the bootloader (apart
from the things described in
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/booting.php of course). And I
don't see a problem for in-kernel users of mc13783_reg_write to modify
the register. If the mc13783-API is changed that
MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS must only be modified by using (say)
mc13783_powermisc_rmw() it's a (probably uncatched) bug to use
mc13783_reg_write.
And patch 1 is definitly *not* material for .33, as there is currently
no user of MC13783_REG_POWER_MISCELLANEOUS in .33-rc1, so there is
nothing to fix.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list