[PATCH 0/5] OMAP4 Power Domain Framework Support

[Pagare, Abhijit]

Paul,

> thanks.  One other thing that I noticed: in the first powerdomain patch,in > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/cpu.h, in struct omap_chip_id, the 'oc' 
> field needs to be a u16, rather than a u8.

Thanks, it has been taken care of.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pagare, Abhijit
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:06 AM
> To: 'Paul Walmsley'
> Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4 Power Domain Framework Support
> 
> Paul,
> 	There is one Fix patch for OMAP3 on top of which these patches
> should go in cleanly. I will post the fix patch and the rebased and tested
> patch-set soon.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Abhijit Pagare
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul at pwsan.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:00 AM
> > To: Pagare, Abhijit
> > Cc: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> > Cousson, Benoit; Nayak, Rajendra
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4 Power Domain Framework Support
> >
> > Hello Abhijit,
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
> >
> > > This patch series adds support for OMAP4 power domain framework.
> >
> > Just tried applying these -- looks like this series (and probably the
> > clockdomain series also) needs to be refreshed to apply cleanly against
> > the current linux-omap head.  Could you please rebase, retest if needed,
> > and repost?

I have posted the patches rebased against the linux-omap head. Keep me updated with your inputs.

> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > - Paul


Regards,
Abhijit