[PATCH 3/4] ARM: L2 : Errata 588369: Clean & Invalidate do notinvalidate clean lines
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Mon Dec 14 05:37:13 EST 2009
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 18:43 +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> This patch implements the work-around for the errata 588369. The secure API
> is used to alter L2 debug regsiter because of trust-zone.
[...]
> +config PL310_ERRATA_588369
> + bool "Clean & Invalidate maintenance operations do not invalidate clean lines"
> + depends on CACHE_L2X0
> + default n
> + help
> + The PL310 L2 cache controller implements three types of Clean &
> + Invalidate maintenance operations: by Physical Address
> + (offset 0x7F0), by Index/Way (0x7F8) and by Way (0x7FC).
> + They are architecturally defined to behave as the execution of a
> + clean operation followed immediately by an invalidate operation,
> + both performing to the same memory location. This functionality
> + is not correctly implemented in PL310 as clean lines are not
> + invalidated as a result of these operations
> endmenu
Could you actually add a comment and a dependence on OMAP4 since this
requires the secure monitor that only TI has.
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PL310_ERRATA_588369
> + /*
> + * Disable Write-Back and Cache Linefill (set bits [1:0] of the Debug
> + * Control Register)
> + */
> + __asm__ __volatile__(
> + "stmfd r13!, {r0-r12, r14}\n"
> + "mov r0, #3\n"
> + "ldr r12, =0x100\n"
> + "dsb\n"
> + "smc\n"
> + "ldmfd r13!, {r0-r12, r14}");
Could you actually add a function that gets called with a parameter
rather than having to similar inline asm blocks? You also don't need to
save/restore the registers if you declare them properly or use local
variables for that, the compiler does the work for you.
Is a DSB needed before SMC (I'm not sure)?
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list