[PATCH 3/4] ARM: L2 : Errata 588369: Clean & Invalidate do notinvalidate clean lines

Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas at arm.com
Mon Dec 14 05:37:13 EST 2009


On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 18:43 +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> This patch implements the work-around for the errata 588369. The secure API
> is used to alter L2 debug regsiter because of trust-zone.
[...]
> +config PL310_ERRATA_588369
> +       bool "Clean & Invalidate maintenance operations do not invalidate clean lines"
> +       depends on CACHE_L2X0
> +       default n
> +       help
> +          The PL310 L2 cache controller implements three types of Clean &
> +          Invalidate maintenance operations: by Physical Address
> +          (offset 0x7F0), by Index/Way (0x7F8) and by Way (0x7FC).
> +          They are architecturally defined to behave as the execution of a
> +          clean operation followed immediately by an invalidate operation,
> +          both performing to the same memory location. This functionality
> +          is not correctly implemented in PL310 as clean lines are not
> +          invalidated as a result of these operations
>  endmenu

Could you actually add a comment and a dependence on OMAP4 since this
requires the secure monitor that only TI has.
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PL310_ERRATA_588369
> +       /*
> +        * Disable Write-Back and Cache Linefill (set bits [1:0] of the Debug
> +        * Control Register)
> +        */
> +       __asm__ __volatile__(
> +       "stmfd r13!, {r0-r12, r14}\n"
> +       "mov r0, #3\n"
> +       "ldr r12, =0x100\n"
> +       "dsb\n"
> +       "smc\n"
> +       "ldmfd r13!, {r0-r12, r14}");

Could you actually add a function that gets called with a parameter
rather than having to similar inline asm blocks? You also don't need to
save/restore the registers if you declare them properly or use local
variables for that, the compiler does the work for you.

Is a DSB needed before SMC (I'm not sure)?

-- 
Catalin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list