[PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: Add thermal zones

[sashiko-bot at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] dts: thermal trip points labeled as 'hot' are incorrectly typed as 'passive'
--

commit f22129efed7c6439714c1c2501834a6c01be9e9e
Author: Ronald Claveau <linux-kernel-dev at aliel.fr>

arm64: dts: amlogic: t7: Add thermal zones

This commit adds thermal zones for all six sensors (a53, a73, gpu, nna,
vpu, and hevc) to the amlogic t7 device tree configuration.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
> index c81632d3984e8..454a042865a5a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/amlogic-t7.dtsi

[ ... ]

> +		gpu_thermal: gpu-thermal {
> +			polling-delay = <1000>;
> +			polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> +			thermal-sensors = <&gpu_tsensor>;
> +
> +			trips {
> +				gpu_passive: gpu-passive {
> +					temperature = <95000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";
> +				};
> +
> +				gpu_hot: gpu-hot {
> +					temperature = <105000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";

[Severity: Medium]
Does this incorrectly set the trip type for gpu-hot to "passive" instead
of "hot"? The thermal subsystem will treat this as a passive trip point,
meaning the standard hot thermal events won't trigger at the 105°C
threshold.

> +				};

[ ... ]

> +		hevc_thermal: hevc-thermal {
> +			polling-delay = <1000>;
> +			polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> +			thermal-sensors = <&hevc_tsensor>;
> +
> +			trips {
> +				hevc_passive: hevc-passive {
> +					temperature = <95000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";
> +				};
> +
> +				hevc_hot: hevc-hot {
> +					temperature = <105000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";

[Severity: Medium]
Similarly, should the type for hevc-hot be "hot" rather than "passive"?

> +				};

[ ... ]

> +		nna_thermal: nna-thermal {
> +			polling-delay = <1000>;
> +			polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> +			thermal-sensors = <&nna_tsensor>;
> +
> +			trips {
> +				nna_passive: nna-passive {
> +					temperature = <95000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";
> +				};
> +
> +				nna_hot: nna-hot {
> +					temperature = <105000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";

[Severity: Medium]
Does this nna-hot trip point also need its type updated to "hot" so that
it behaves distinctly from the passive trip point?

> +				};

[ ... ]

> +		vpu_thermal: vpu-thermal {
> +			polling-delay = <1000>;
> +			polling-delay-passive = <100>;
> +			thermal-sensors = <&vpu_tsensor>;
> +
> +			trips {
> +				vpu_passive: vpu-passive {
> +					temperature = <95000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";
> +				};
> +
> +				vpu_hot: vpu-hot {
> +					temperature = <105000>;
> +					hysteresis = <5000>;
> +					type = "passive";

[Severity: Medium]
Is this another instance where the vpu-hot type was intended to be
"hot" rather than "passive"?

> +				};

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015-add-thermal-t7-vim4-v6-0-37d1c954390c@aliel.fr?part=3