[PATCH v6 1/2] PCI: Configure Root Port MPS during host probing

Hans Zhang 18255117159 at 163.com
Thu Nov 27 08:58:07 PST 2025


Hi Bjorn,

Thank you very much for your reply and the problems you pointed out. The 
next version will modify it.

Best regards,
Hans

On 2025/11/27 07:54, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 12:51:24AM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> Current PCIe initialization logic may leave Root Ports (root bridges)
>> operating with non-optimal Maximum Payload Size (MPS) settings. Existing
>> code in pci_configure_mps() returns early for devices without an upstream
>> bridge (!bridge) which includes Root Ports, so their MPS values remain
>> at firmware/hardware defaults. This fails to utilize the controller's full
>> capabilities, leading to suboptimal data transfer efficiency across the
>> PCIe hierarchy.
>>
>> With this patch, during the host controller probing phase:
>> - When PCIe bus tuning is enabled (not PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF), and
>> - The device is a Root Port without an upstream bridge (!bridge),
>> The Root Port's MPS is set to its hardware-supported maximum value
>> (128 << dev->pcie_mpss).
>>
>> Note that this initial maximum MPS setting may be reduced later, during
>> downstream device enumeration, if any downstream device does not suppor
>> the Root Port's maximum MPS.
>>
>> This change ensures Root Ports are properly initialized before downstream
>> devices negotiate MPS, while maintaining backward compatibility via the
>> PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF check.
> 
> "Properly" is sort of a junk word for me because all it really says is
> we were stupid before, and we're smarter now, but it doesn't explain
> exactly *what* was wrong and why this new thing is "proper."
> 
> It's obvious that the Max_Payload_Size power-on default (128 bytes) is
> suboptimal in some situations, so you don't even need to say that.
> And I think 128 bytes *is* optimal in the PCIE_BUS_PEER2PEER case.
> 
> s/Root Ports (root bridges)/Root Ports/
> s/bridge (!bridge)/bridge/     # a couple times
> s/hardware-supported//         # unnecessary
> s/(128 << dev->pcie_mpss)//    # we can read the spec
> s/suppor/support/
> 
>> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel at kernel.org>
>> Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani at kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159 at 163.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/probe.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 0ce98e18b5a8..2459def3af9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -2196,6 +2196,18 @@ static void pci_configure_mps(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Unless MPS strategy is PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF (don't touch MPS at all),
>> +	 * start off by setting Root Ports' MPS to MPSS. This only applies to
>> +	 * Root Ports without an upstream bridge (root bridges), as other Root
>> +	 * Ports will have downstream bridges.
> 
> I can't parse this sentence.  *No* Root Port has an upstream bridge.
> So I don't know what "other Root Ports" would be or why they would
> have downstream bridges (any Root Port is likely to have downstream
> endpoints or bridges).
> 
>> +	   ... Depending on the MPS strategy
>> +	 * and MPSS of downstream devices, the Root Port's MPS may be
>> +	 * overridden later.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!bridge && pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
>> +	    pcie_bus_config != PCIE_BUS_TUNE_OFF)
>> +		pcie_set_mps(dev, 128 << dev->pcie_mpss);
>> +
>>   	if (!bridge || !pci_is_pcie(bridge))
>>   		return;
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>




More information about the linux-amlogic mailing list