[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: controller: allow node name to be named slot@*
Neil Armstrong
neil.armstrong at linaro.org
Mon Oct 7 02:00:08 PDT 2024
Hi Rob, Krzysztof,
On 24/09/2024 11:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:38:03AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> In preparation of supporting the mmc-slot subnode, allow
>> the nodename to be either mmc@ or mmc-slot@
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml
>> index 58ae298cd2fc..f797c32ea688 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml
>> @@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ description: |
>>
>> properties:
>> $nodename:
>> - pattern: "^mmc(@.*)?$"
>> + oneOf:
>> + - pattern: "^mmc(@.*)?$"
>> + - pattern: "^slot(@.*)?$"
>
> I don't think mmc-slot is allowed by this.
>
> This should be squashed with mmc-slot child patch. It does not make
> sense to allow mmc-slots if there are no mmc-slots.
Right, I don't like this oneOf/pattern, slot@(@.*)? should really only be for slots,
by I do not see how this can be achieved because we can't override properties: pattern.
Do you have any suggestions ?
Neil
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list