[PATCH v4 2/6] dt-bindings: pwm: amlogic: add new compatible for meson8 pwm type
Jerome Brunet
jbrunet at baylibre.com
Wed Jan 17 02:16:31 PST 2024
On Wed 17 Jan 2024 at 10:58, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:16:50PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-amlogic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-amlogic.yaml
>> index a1d382aacb82..eece390114a3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-amlogic.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-amlogic.yaml
>> @@ -21,23 +21,35 @@ properties:
>> - amlogic,meson-g12a-ee-pwm
>> - amlogic,meson-g12a-ao-pwm-ab
>> - amlogic,meson-g12a-ao-pwm-cd
>> - - amlogic,meson-s4-pwm
>> + deprecated: true
>> - items:
>> - const: amlogic,meson-gx-pwm
>> - const: amlogic,meson-gxbb-pwm
>> + deprecated: true
>> - items:
>> - const: amlogic,meson-gx-ao-pwm
>> - const: amlogic,meson-gxbb-ao-pwm
>> + deprecated: true
>> - items:
>> - const: amlogic,meson8-pwm
>> - const: amlogic,meson8b-pwm
>> + deprecated: true
>
> I think deprecating the old binding and adding a new compatible should
> be done in two commits.
Hi Uwe,
There was the same comment on v3 and Krzysztof said it should be done
like this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/e127dcef-3149-443a-9a8c-d24ef4054f09@linaro.org
I tend to agree with Krzysztof on this but, as I previously said,
I don't really mind one way or the other. Just have to pick one.
>
>> + - const: amlogic,meson8-pwm-v2
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - amlogic,meson8b-pwm-v2
>> + - amlogic,meson-gxbb-pwm-v2
>> + - amlogic,meson-axg-pwm-v2
>> + - amlogic,meson-g12-pwm-v2
>> + - const: amlogic,meson8-pwm-v2
>> + - const: amlogic,meson-s4-pwm
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
--
Jerome
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list