[PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: amlogic: add libretech cottonwood support

[Jerome Brunet]

On Fri 06 Oct 2023 at 10:32, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org> wrote:

> On 06/10/2023 10:21, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On Thu 05 Oct 2023 at 12:04, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 05/10/2023 11:42, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>> On Tue 03 Oct 2023 at 09:35, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02/10/2023 20:57, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon 02 Oct 2023 at 18:45, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong at linaro.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +&usb3_pcie_phy {
>>>>>>>> +	#address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>>>> +	#size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>>>> +	phy-supply = <&vcc_5v>;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	hub: hub at 1 {
>>>>>>>> +		compatible = "usb5e3,626";
>>>>>>>> +		reg = <1>;
>>>>>>>> +		reset-gpios = <&gpio GPIOC_7 (GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
>>>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure the PHY is the right place to put the USB HUB,
>>>>>>> and it's probable the HUB is connected to both the USB2 and USB3 lines
>>>>>> It is connected to the USB3.0 only
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so you should have both USB IDs in DT like it'd done for the Odroid-C4:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> / {
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>             /* USB hub supports both USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 root hub */
>>>>>>>             usb-hub {
>>>>>>>                     dr_mode = "host";
>>>>>>>                     #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>>>                     #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /* 2.0 hub on port 1 */
>>>>>>>                     hub_2_0: hub at 1 {
>>>>>>>                             compatible = "usb2109,2817";
>>>>>>>                             reg = <1>;
>>>>>>>                             peer-hub = <&hub_3_0>;
>>>>>>>                             reset-gpios = <&gpio GPIOH_4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>>>>>                             vdd-supply = <&vcc_5v>;
>>>>>>>                     };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                     /* 3.1 hub on port 4 */
>>>>>>>                     hub_3_0: hub at 2 {
>>>>>>>                             compatible = "usb2109,817";
>>>>>>>                             reg = <2>;
>>>>>>>                             peer-hub = <&hub_2_0>;
>>>>>>>                             reset-gpios = <&gpio GPIOH_4 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>>>>>>>                             vdd-supply = <&vcc_5v>;
>>>>>>>                     };
>>>>>>>             };
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if it only has a single USB ID, then it should go under the dwc3 node.
>>>>>> The usb controller is connected to the PHY and what's coming out of the
>>>>>> PHY
>>>>>> goes to the hub. It seems logical to hub the hub under it.
>>>>>> Why bypass the PHY ?
>>>>>
>>>>> The USB bindings the USB devices nodes should be under the controller's node,
>>>>> not the PHY, see:
>>>>>
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-hcd.yaml
>>>>> ...
>>>>> patternProperties:
>>>>>     "^.*@[0-9a-f]{1,2}$":
>>>>>       description: The hard wired USB devices
>>>>>       type: object
>>>>>       $ref: /schemas/usb/usb-device.yaml
>>>>> ...
>>>>> and the example.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subnodes aren't allowed in the PHY node.
>>>> Ok, that is what schema says.
>>>> HW wise there is possible problem though.
>>>> The phy node has the power supply to the bus.
>>>> In that case it is a controllable one.
>>>> If fixed USB devices go under the controller instead of the PHY, isn't
>>>> it possible that the kernel may attempt to probe them before the bus is
>>>> powered ? For this particular board, it would make the reset we are
>>>> trying to apply useless.
>>>
>>> The usb core has a special handling for those usb hubs doing the power
>>> up at the right time during the USB setup, including the PHY powering up.
>>> So the power sequence should be fine.
>>>
>>> This has been done on Odroid-C2 and Odroid-N2 already.
>> Tried it. Unfortunately something is off with the hub under the dwc3 node
>> I often get this error (like once in 3 boots):
>> [    0.419301] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbfs
>> [    0.424434] usbcore: registered new interface driver hub
>> [    0.429696] usbcore: registered new device driver usb
>> [    0.921460] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
>> [    0.968157] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
>> [    0.972114] usbhid: USB HID core driver
>> [    1.132529] dwc3-meson-g12a ffe09000.usb: USB2 ports: 2
>> [    1.134897] dwc3-meson-g12a ffe09000.usb: USB3 ports: 1
>> [    1.144451] dwc2 ff400000.usb: supply vusb_d not found, using dummy regulator
>> [    1.147231] dwc2 ff400000.usb: supply vusb_a not found, using dummy regulator
>> [    1.154464] dwc2 ff400000.usb: EPs: 7, dedicated fifos, 712 entries in SPRAM
>> [    1.219515] usb usb2: We don't know the algorithms for LPM for this host, disabling LPM.
>> [    1.469260] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
>> [    1.745395] usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
>> [    9.794777] usbcore: registered new device driver onboard-usb-hub
>> [   10.255484] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: Failed to suspend device, error -32
>> [   10.261699] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: can't set config #1, error -71
>> [   10.287500] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: Failed to suspend device, error -32
>> [   10.287844] onboard-usb-hub 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
>> [   10.573277] usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using xhci-hcd
>> [   10.921468] usb 2-1: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
>> [   11.193453] usb 2-1: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd
>> While it works reliably when the onboard-usb-hub is under the phy node.
>> I added the 5v supply as vdd under the hub for good measure.
>
> The .reset_us you used from genesys_gl852g is probably too low, you may need to use a bigger one then.
>

Indeed. This seems to do the trick.
I'll change this

Thx

> Neil
>
>> 
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Neil
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +&usb {
>>>>>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>