[PATCH] mmc: meson-gx: increase power-up delay
Marc Gonzalez
marc.w.gonzalez at free.fr
Thu Mar 16 06:02:14 PDT 2023
On 16/03/2023 13:32, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 15/03/2023 22:14, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>
>> Then you mention "too soon after reset", but add a delay to power-up.
>> If the delay would be needed after reset, then shouldn't it be in
>> meson_mmc_probe() after the call to device_reset_optional()?
>
> The first mmc_power_up() is called from:
>
> [ 0.916446] mmc_power_up+0x2c/0xe4
> [ 0.926186] mmc_start_host+0x94/0xa0
> [ 0.926197] mmc_add_host+0x84/0xf0
> [ 0.926205] meson_mmc_probe+0x374/0x3f4
> [ 0.933086] platform_probe+0x68/0xe0
> [ 0.940159] really_probe+0xbc/0x2f0
> [ 0.948008] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0
> [ 0.955080] driver_probe_device+0xd8/0x160
> [ 0.955087] __driver_attach_async_helper+0x4c/0xc0
> [ 0.965689] async_run_entry_fn+0x34/0xe0
> [ 0.965699] process_one_work+0x1cc/0x320
> [ 0.972847] worker_thread+0x14c/0x450
> [ 0.972855] kthread+0x10c/0x110
> [ 1.018906] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
>
> The second mmc_power_up() (prematurely exited) is called from:
>
> [ 1.061686] mmc_power_up+0x2c/0xe4
> [ 1.065136] mmc_rescan+0x18c/0x310
> [ 1.068586] process_one_work+0x1cc/0x320
> [ 1.072553] worker_thread+0x14c/0x450
> [ 1.076262] kthread+0x10c/0x110
> [ 1.086528] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
>
> I'm confused about device_reset_optional() vs mmc_power_up().
> Do they both reset the controller?
NB: adding 500 ms delay after device_reset_optional() DOES NOT
fix the issue:
[ 0.875494] >ffe03000.sd
[ 0.875823] meson-gx-mmc ffe03000.sd: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.027111] >ffe07000.mmc
[ 1.027430] meson-gx-mmc ffe07000.mmc: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.405170] +mmc2
[ 1.405389] -mmc2
[ 1.405413] <ffe03000.sd
[ 1.405500] +mmc2
[ 1.412957] Q
[ 1.420317] R
[ 1.422590] mmc2: YO no device WTF
We enter mmc_power_up at 1.405170
We enter mmc_attach_sdio at 1.412957
Empirically, 8 ms is not enough time for the SDIO bus to be ready.
Reverting to default power_delay_ms.
[ 0.879842] >ffe03000.sd
[ 0.880189] meson-gx-mmc ffe03000.sd: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.031635] >ffe07000.mmc
[ 1.031958] meson-gx-mmc ffe07000.mmc: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.405284] +mmc2
[ 1.430499] -mmc2
[ 1.430525] <ffe03000.sd
[ 1.430616] +mmc2
[ 1.438065] Q
[ 1.445404] R
[ 1.447677] mmc2: YO no device WTF
We enter mmc_power_up at 1.405284
We enter mmc_attach_sdio at 1.438065
Empirically, 33 ms is not enough time for the SDIO bus to be ready.
Increasing power_delay_ms to 15.
[ 0.879788] >ffe03000.sd
[ 0.880092] meson-gx-mmc ffe03000.sd: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.031437] >ffe07000.mmc
[ 1.031767] meson-gx-mmc ffe07000.mmc: allocated mmc-pwrseq
[ 1.405262] +mmc2
[ 1.442981] -mmc2
[ 1.443007] <ffe03000.sd
[ 1.443099] +mmc2
[ 1.450549] Q
[ 1.565950] +mmc1
[ 1.584306] mmc2: new ultra high speed SDR50 SDIO card at address 0001
We enter mmc_power_up at 1.405262
We enter mmc_attach_sdio at 1.450549
Empirically, 45 ms *is* enough time for the SDIO bus to be ready.
My gut feeling is that the problem with SDIO devices exists on all boards.
(I am well aware that I may be wrong.)
Would you be willing to test a small kernel?
I can provide a kernel defconfig and/or a buildroot defconfig.
Regards
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list