[PATCH v2 1/1] of: fdt: Scan /memreserve/ last
Rob Herring
robh+dt at kernel.org
Mon Apr 10 05:52:36 PDT 2023
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 7:00 AM Lucas Tanure <tanure at linux.com> wrote:
>
> Change the order of scanning /memreserve/ and /reserved-memory node.
> /reserved-memory node should go first, as it has a more updated
> description of the memory regions and it can apply flags, like nomap.
> Also, /memreserve/ should avoid reserving regions described in
> /reserved-memory node.
Like I said on v1, I think doing this has a high chance of causing
regressions on other platforms. It should probably not go to stable
for some time after a kernel release.
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanure at linux.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index d1a68b6d03b3..26e608d8025d 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -635,16 +635,21 @@ void __init early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem(void)
> if (!initial_boot_params)
> return;
>
> + fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> + fdt_reserve_elfcorehdr();
> +
> /* Process header /memreserve/ fields */
> for (n = 0; ; n++) {
> fdt_get_mem_rsv(initial_boot_params, n, &base, &size);
> if (!size)
> break;
> + if (memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.memory, base, size) &&
> + memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
Just to make sure, a partial overlap will still get reserved?
> + break;
Shouldn't we continue to the next entry rather than stopping.
> +
> memblock_reserve(base, size);
> }
>
> - fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
> - fdt_reserve_elfcorehdr();
> fdt_init_reserved_mem();
> }
>
> --
> 2.40.0
>
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list