[PATCH v2] reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable
aouledameur at baylibre.com
Fri Nov 13 10:28:05 EST 2020
On 13/11/2020 16:04, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 00:00 +0100, Amjad Ouled-Ameur wrote:
>> The current reset framework API does not allow to release what is done by
>> reset_control_reset(), IOW decrement triggered_count. Add the new
>> reset_control_rearm() call to do so.
>> When reset_control_reset() has been called once, the counter
>> triggered_count, in the reset framework, is incremented i.e the resource
>> under the reset is in-use and the reset should not be done again.
>> reset_control_rearm() would be the way to state that the resource is
>> no longer used and, that from the caller's perspective, the reset can be
>> fired again if necessary.
>> Signed-off-by: Amjad Ouled-Ameur <aouledameur at baylibre.com>
>> Reported-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com>
>> Change since v1: 
>> * Renamed the new call from reset_control_(array_)resettable to
>> * Open-coded reset_control_array_rearm to check for errors before
>> decrementing triggered_count because we cannot roll back in case an
>> error occurs while decrementing one of the rstc.
>> * Reworded the new call's description.
> Thank you, applied to reset/next.
Thank you for reviewing and approving my patch !
Furthermore, I think your idea of open coding reset_control_array_rearm
was accurate, and should be also applied to reset_control_array_reset()
What do you think ?
In case you agree it is necessary to do so, I can work out an upcoming
patchset to fix this matter.
More information about the linux-amlogic