[PATCH v3 00/10] clk: implement clock rate protection mechanism

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com> wrote:

> To build confidence that this won't be causing regression, I'd like to check
> that platform using this flag are no relying on the broken behavior.
>
> I've included the clock maintainers of at91, qcom, and ux500 (you) in this
> thread because they are the heaviest users of this flag, so the more likely to
> report a problem.

OK I'm pretty sure this will not impact the ux500 in a negative way,
we don't play around much with the clocks in that way.

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>

for the entire series.

Yours,
Linus Walleij