[PATCH v3 03/10] clk: rework calls to round and determine rate callbacks
Stephen Boyd
sboyd at codeaurora.org
Tue Jul 11 18:49:17 PDT 2017
On 06/12, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> Rework the way the callbacks round_rate and determine_rate are called. The
> goal is to do this at a single point and make it easier to add conditions
> before calling them.
This should also say that now we check the rate returned by
determine_rate ops against the min/max rates so that we don't
exceed the limits?
>
> This rework is done to ease the integration of "protected" clock
> functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet at baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index dceaf0ff23db..8cc4672414be 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -833,16 +833,34 @@ static int clk_disable_unused(void)
> }
> late_initcall_sync(clk_disable_unused);
>
> -static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> - struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +static int clk_core_determine_round(struct clk_core *core,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> {
> - struct clk_core *parent;
> long rate;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
Best to leave this in place for clk_core_determine_round().
> + if (core->ops->determine_rate) {
> + return core->ops->determine_rate(core->hw, req);
> + } else if (core->ops->round_rate) {
> + rate = core->ops->round_rate(core->hw, req->rate,
> + &req->best_parent_rate);
> + if (rate < 0)
> + return rate;
>
> - if (!core)
> - return 0;
> + req->rate = rate;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void clk_core_init_rate_req(struct clk_core *core,
Can core be const?
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct clk_core *parent;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!core || !req))
> + return;
>
> parent = core->parent;
> if (parent) {
> @@ -852,22 +870,24 @@ static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> req->best_parent_hw = NULL;
> req->best_parent_rate = 0;
> }
> +}
>
> - if (core->ops->determine_rate) {
> - return core->ops->determine_rate(core->hw, req);
> - } else if (core->ops->round_rate) {
> - rate = core->ops->round_rate(core->hw, req->rate,
> - &req->best_parent_rate);
> - if (rate < 0)
> - return rate;
> +static int clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&prepare_lock);
>
> - req->rate = rate;
> - } else if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> - return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(parent, req);
> - } else {
> - req->rate = core->rate;
> - }
> + if (!core)
> + return 0;
> +
> + clk_core_init_rate_req(core, req);
> +
> + if (core->ops->determine_rate || core->ops->round_rate)
> + return clk_core_determine_round(core, req);
> + else if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
> + return clk_core_round_rate_nolock(core->parent, req);
>
> + req->rate = core->rate;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1356,36 +1376,26 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk_core *core,
> clk_core_get_boundaries(core, &min_rate, &max_rate);
>
> /* find the closest rate and parent clk/rate */
> - if (core->ops->determine_rate) {
> + if (core->ops->determine_rate || core->ops->round_rate) {
This is the second time we check this, maybe another function for
clk_core_can_round(core) is in order?
> struct clk_rate_request req;
>
> req.rate = rate;
> req.min_rate = min_rate;
> req.max_rate = max_rate;
> - if (parent) {
> - req.best_parent_hw = parent->hw;
> - req.best_parent_rate = parent->rate;
> - } else {
> - req.best_parent_hw = NULL;
> - req.best_parent_rate = 0;
> - }
>
> - ret = core->ops->determine_rate(core->hw, &req);
> + clk_core_init_rate_req(core, &req);
> +
> + ret = clk_core_determine_round(core, &req);
> if (ret < 0)
> return NULL;
>
> best_parent_rate = req.best_parent_rate;
> new_rate = req.rate;
> parent = req.best_parent_hw ? req.best_parent_hw->core : NULL;
> - } else if (core->ops->round_rate) {
> - ret = core->ops->round_rate(core->hw, rate,
> - &best_parent_rate);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return NULL;
>
> - new_rate = ret;
> if (new_rate < min_rate || new_rate > max_rate)
> return NULL;
> +
Nitpick: Kill this newline.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list