[PATCH v2] ARM64: dts: amlogic: Add basic support for Amlogic S905X
Kevin Hilman
khilman at baylibre.com
Mon Aug 29 10:46:55 PDT 2016
Carlo Caione <carlo at caione.org> writes:
> From: Carlo Caione <carlo at endlessm.com>
>
> This patch introduces the basic support for the Amlogic S905X (Meson
> GXL) and for the Amlogic evaluation board P212.
> No documentation has been released yet for this SoC, so for now only the
> bare minimum has been added in the DT.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber at suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <carlo at endlessm.com>
> ---
>
> Hey Kevin,
> Can you take this one?
>
> Changelog:
> v2:
> - Added acked-by and reviewed-by
>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt | 5 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-p212.dts | 70 +++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl.dtsi | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++
It seems to me that meson-gxl.dtsi is almost identicial to
meson-gxbb.dtsi. I think we should create another .dtsi for all the
common parts. Something like meson-gx-common.dtsi, which is included
by meson-gxbb.dtsi and meson-gxl.dtsi
Also, the GXL family has both the S905x and S905D SoCs, so we may need
meson-gxl-s905x.dtsi and meson-gxl-s905d.dtsi but I'm not sure of the
full set of differences between those, so we can save that for later.
But, I do think the board files should probably have the SoC name. So
they would look something like: meson-gxl-s905x-p212.dts (which you
have) and meson-gxl-s905d-p230.dts (which I have.)
Kevin
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list