[PATCH v0 1/4] i2c: bcm-iproc: Use complete() instead of complete_all()
Ray Jui
ray.jui at broadcom.com
Wed Aug 3 09:36:10 PDT 2016
Hi Daniel,
On 8/3/2016 5:03 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner at bmw-carit.de>
>
> There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there
> is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by
> using complete() instead of complete_all().
>
> The usage pattern of the completion is:
>
> bcm_iproc_i2c_xfer_single_msg()
> reinit_completion()
> ...
> (activate the transfer)
> ...
> wait_for_completion_timeout()
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner at bmw-carit.de>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> index 19c8438..95f7cac 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static irqreturn_t bcm_iproc_i2c_isr(int irq, void *data)
>
> if (status & BIT(IS_M_START_BUSY_SHIFT)) {
> iproc_i2c->xfer_is_done = 1;
> - complete_all(&iproc_i2c->done);
> + complete(&iproc_i2c->done);
> }
>
> writel(status, iproc_i2c->base + IS_OFFSET);
>
Yes each time there's only one waiter invoked from the main transfer
routine 'bcm_iproc_i2c_xfer_single_msg'.
This change looks good to me, thanks!
Acked-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui at broadcom.com>
More information about the linux-amlogic
mailing list