[PATCH net v9 02/14] afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error

[netdev-bot+sashiko at kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:

Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 0 · Low: 1

- [Low] Whitespace debris introduced by the patch:
  afs_send_simple_reply() in fs/afs/rxrpc.c now contains two consecutive…

--

afs: Fix afs to abort the rxrpc call on send error

This makes afs_send_empty_reply() and afs_send_simple_reply() always try to
abort the rxrpc call on a send error instead of only aborting on -ENOMEM,
and makes afs_make_call() abort unconditionally on send error.  The
afs_abort_oom trace enum is replaced by afs_abort_send_error.

Link: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260824091645.415423-1-dhowells%40redhat.com

> diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
> index a80b043d36be4..04756d8744e2f 100644
> --- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
> +++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -930,12 +920,9 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_call *call, const void *buf, size_t len)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (n == -ENOMEM) {
> -		_debug("oom");
> -		rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(net->socket, call->rxcall,
> -					RXGEN_SS_MARSHAL, -ENOMEM,
> -					afs_abort_oom);
> -	}
> +
> +	rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(net->socket, call->rxcall,
> +				RXGEN_SS_MARSHAL, n, afs_abort_send_error);
>  	_leave(" [error]");
>  }

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but the removal of the -ENOMEM block seems to have left an
extra blank line behind in afs_send_simple_reply().  After the patch the
function reads:

	if (n >= 0) {
		/* Success */
		_leave(" [replied]");
		return;
	}

	rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(net->socket, call->rxcall,
				RXGEN_SS_MARSHAL, n, afs_abort_send_error);

That is two consecutive blank lines, which checkpatch --strict flags with
"please don't use multiple blank lines".  Since this patch carries
cc: stable at vger.kernel.org, would it be worth dropping the added blank line
so the backports don't inherit it?  It is still present at the end of the
series.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907113743.1453210-1-dhowells%40redhat.com