Backport RXRPC for 6.1.y from 6.2

[Jeffrey E Altman]

On 5/10/2026 12:36 PM, Wentao Guan wrote:
>> Why is this needed?  If you want this, please provide a working set of
>> patches properly submitted, along with the reasoning why you just don't
>> move to a newer kernel version.  And do you really use the AFS
>> filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree?  If so, why?
> FYI, there are bugfixes such as ("rxrpc: Fix conn-level packet handling to unshare RESPONSE packets")
> affect the 6.1.y kernel, and the final goal is clean apply fixes for CVE-2026-43500 such as
> ("rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present") in maillist.
>
>> move to a newer kernel version.  And do you really use the AFS
>> filesystem in a 6.1.y kernel tree?  If so, why?
> NO, just affected by compiled kernel which enabled the config:(,
> we are preparing fix such as disable AFS and AF_RXRPC or fix it...
>
> BRs
> Wentao Guan

Wentao,

Are you associated with a Linux distribution which ships 6.1.y stable?

Or are you building the kernel for local use?

Greg,

I believe Debian Bookworm ships 6.1.y kernels with RXRPC compiled and 
packaged.

Jeffrey Altman

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4467 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/attachments/20260510/aa5408e8/attachment-0001.p7s>