[PATCH net 4/4] net: Comment copy_from_sockptr() explaining its behaviour
David Wei
dw at davidwei.uk
Thu Nov 14 18:43:37 PST 2024
On 2024-11-14 15:27, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> copy_from_sockptr() has a history of misuse. Add a comment explaining that
> the function follows API of copy_from_user(), i.e. returns 0 for success,
> or number of bytes not copied on error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal at rbox.co>
> ---
> include/linux/sockptr.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sockptr.h b/include/linux/sockptr.h
> index 195debe2b1dbc5abf768aa806eb6c73b99421e27..3e6c8e9d67aef66e8ac5a4e474c278ac08244163 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sockptr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sockptr.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static inline int copy_from_sockptr_offset(void *dst, sockptr_t src,
> /* Deprecated.
> * This is unsafe, unless caller checked user provided optlen.
> * Prefer copy_safe_from_sockptr() instead.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 for success, or number of bytes not copied on error.
> */
> static inline int copy_from_sockptr(void *dst, sockptr_t src, size_t size)
> {
>
In addition to this, please update the docs for copy_safe_from_sockptr()
that calls into copy_from_sockptr() which also contains the
misunderstanding of what copy_from_sockptr() returns.
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list