[PATCH net 1/4] bluetooth: Improve setsockopt() handling of malformed user input
David Wei
dw at davidwei.uk
Thu Nov 14 16:42:01 PST 2024
On 2024-11-14 15:27, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> The bt_copy_from_sockptr() return value is being misinterpreted by most
> users: a non-zero result is mistakenly assumed to represent an error code,
> but actually indicates the number of bytes that could not be copied.
>
> Remove bt_copy_from_sockptr() and adapt callers to use
> copy_safe_from_sockptr().
>
> For sco_sock_setsockopt() (case BT_CODEC) use copy_struct_from_sockptr() to
> scrub parts of uninitialized buffer.
>
> Opportunistically, rename `len` to `optlen` in hci_sock_setsockopt_old()
> and hci_sock_setsockopt().
>
> Fixes: 51eda36d33e4 ("Bluetooth: SCO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: a97de7bff13b ("Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: 4f3951242ace ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: 9e8742cdfc4b ("Bluetooth: ISO: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Fixes: b2186061d604 ("Bluetooth: hci_sock: Fix not validating setsockopt user input")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal at rbox.co>
> ---
> include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h | 9 ---------
> net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c | 14 +++++++-------
> net/bluetooth/iso.c | 10 +++++-----
> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 9 ++++-----
> net/bluetooth/sco.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> index f48250e3f2e103c75d5937e1608e43c123aa3297..1001fb4cc21c0ecc7bcdd3ea9041770ede4f27b8 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
> @@ -629,10 +629,9 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname,
>
> switch (optname) {
> case RFCOMM_LM:
> - if (bt_copy_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen)) {
> - err = -EFAULT;
> + err = copy_safe_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen);
> + if (err)
> break;
> - }
This will return a positive integer if copy_safe_from_sockptr() fails.
Shouldn't this be:
err = -EFAULT;
if (copy_safe_from_sockptr(&opt, sizeof(opt), optval, optlen))
break;
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list