[PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Wed May 8 08:07:57 PDT 2024
On Wed, 08 May 2024 15:00:28 +0100 David Howells wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork.
> > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with
> > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm
> > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how
> > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than
> > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge
> > window (without the Fixes tags)?
>
> Ah, sorry. I marked them rejected as I put myself as cc: not S-o-b on one of
> them, but then got distracted and didn't get around to reposting them. And
> Jeff mentioned that the use of the MORE-PACKETS flag is not exactly
> consistent between various implementations.
Ah, mystery solved :)
> So if you could take just the first two for the moment?
Done!
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list