[PATCH net-next v2 05/39] rxrpc: Don't set the MORE-PACKETS rxrpc wire header flag

[David Howells]

The MORE-PACKETS rxrpc header flag hasn't actually been looked at by
anything since 1988 and not all implementations generate it.

Change rxrpc so that it doesn't set MORE-PACKETS at all rather than setting
it inconsistently.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne at auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni at redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs at lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org
---
 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index b04afb5df241..546abb463c3f 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -385,9 +385,6 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
 		    (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)) {
 			if (msg_data_left(msg) == 0 && !more)
 				txb->flags |= RXRPC_LAST_PACKET;
-			else if (call->tx_top - call->acks_hard_ack <
-				 call->tx_winsize)
-				txb->flags |= RXRPC_MORE_PACKETS;
 
 			ret = call->security->secure_packet(call, txb);
 			if (ret < 0)