[PATCH] rxrpc_find_service_conn_rcu: use read_seqbegin() rather than read_seqbegin_or_lock()

[David Howells]

Oleg Nesterov <oleg at redhat.com> wrote:

> So do you agree that
> 
> 	- the usage of read_seqbegin_or_lock/need_seqretry in
> 	  this code makes no sense because read_seqlock_excl()
> 	  is not possible

Not exactly.  I think it should take a lock on the second pass.

> 	- this patch doesn't change the current behaviour but
> 	  simplifies the code and makes it more clear

That is true.

David