[PATCH net-next 18/26] rxrpc: Split the rxrpc_recvmsg tracepoint
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Tue Nov 8 14:19:47 PST 2022
Split the rxrpc_recvmsg tracepoint so that the tracepoints that are about
data packet processing (and which have extra pieces of information) are
separate from the tracepoint that shows the general flow of recvmsg().
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne at auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs at lists.infradead.org
---
include/trace/events/rxrpc.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index d32e9858c682..84464b29e54a 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -885,6 +885,30 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_receive,
);
TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_recvmsg,
+ TP_PROTO(struct rxrpc_call *call, enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace why,
+ int ret),
+
+ TP_ARGS(call, why, ret),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(unsigned int, call )
+ __field(enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace, why )
+ __field(int, ret )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->call = call ? call->debug_id : 0;
+ __entry->why = why;
+ __entry->ret = ret;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("c=%08x %s ret=%d",
+ __entry->call,
+ __print_symbolic(__entry->why, rxrpc_recvmsg_traces),
+ __entry->ret)
+ );
+
+TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_recvdata,
TP_PROTO(struct rxrpc_call *call, enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace why,
rxrpc_seq_t seq, unsigned int offset, unsigned int len,
int ret),
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
index 46e784edc0f4..77cde6311559 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_term(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct msghdr *msg)
break;
}
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_terminal, call->rx_hard_ack,
- call->rx_pkt_offset, call->rx_pkt_len, ret);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_terminal, call->rx_hard_ack,
+ call->rx_pkt_offset, call->rx_pkt_len, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
ix = seq & RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_MASK;
skb = call->rxtx_buffer[ix];
if (!skb) {
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_hole, seq,
- rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_hole, seq,
+ rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
rxrpc_transmit_ack_packets(call->peer->local);
break;
}
@@ -404,15 +404,15 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
&call->rxtx_annotations[ix],
&rx_pkt_offset, &rx_pkt_len,
&rx_pkt_last);
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_next, seq,
- rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret2);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_next, seq,
+ rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret2);
if (ret2 < 0) {
ret = ret2;
goto out;
}
} else {
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_cont, seq,
- rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_cont, seq,
+ rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
}
/* We have to handle short, empty and used-up DATA packets. */
@@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
}
if (rx_pkt_len > 0) {
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_full, seq,
- rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_full, seq,
+ rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
ASSERTCMP(*_offset, ==, len);
ret = 0;
break;
@@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
call->rx_pkt_last = rx_pkt_last;
}
done:
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_data_return, seq,
- rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_data_return, seq,
+ rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret);
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RX_UNDERRUN, &call->flags);
return ret;
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_enter, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_enter, 0);
if (flags & (MSG_OOB | MSG_TRUNC))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -525,8 +525,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
if (list_empty(&rx->recvmsg_q)) {
if (signal_pending(current))
goto wait_interrupted;
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_wait,
- 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_wait, 0);
timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
}
finish_wait(sk_sleep(&rx->sk), &wait);
@@ -545,7 +544,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_got);
write_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_dequeue, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_dequeue, 0);
/* We're going to drop the socket lock, so we need to lock the call
* against interference by sendmsg.
@@ -630,7 +629,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
error_unlock_call:
mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put);
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, 0, 0, 0, ret);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, ret);
return ret;
error_requeue_call:
@@ -638,14 +637,14 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
write_lock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
list_add(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
write_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_requeue, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_requeue, 0);
} else {
rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put);
}
error_no_call:
release_sock(&rx->sk);
error_trace:
- trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, 0, 0, 0, ret);
+ trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, ret);
return ret;
wait_interrupted:
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list