[PATCH 34/33] netfs: Use in_interrupt() not in_softirq()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:29:31AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Is there a better way to do it?  The intent is to process the assessment phase
> in the calling thread's context if possible rather than bumping over to a
> worker thread.  For synchronous I/O, for example, that's done in the caller's
> thread.  Maybe that's the answer - if it's known to be asynchronous, I have to
> punt, but otherwise don't have to.

Yes, i think you want an explicit flag instead.