[PATCH 24/64] netfs: Pass more information on how to deal with a hole in the cache

[JeffleXu]

On 11/29/21 10:28 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Pass more information to the cache on how to deal with a hole if it
> encounters one when trying to read from the cache.  Three options are
> provided:
> 
>  (1) NETFS_READ_HOLE_IGNORE.  Read the hole along with the data, assuming
>      it to be a punched-out extent by the backing filesystem.
> 
>  (2) NETFS_READ_HOLE_CLEAR.  If there's a hole, erase the requested region
>      of the cache and clear the read buffer.
> 
>  (3) NETFS_READ_HOLE_FAIL.  Fail the read if a hole is detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
> cc: linux-cachefs at redhat.com
> ---
> 
>  fs/netfs/read_helper.c |    8 ++++----
>  include/linux/netfs.h  |   11 ++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/netfs/read_helper.c b/fs/netfs/read_helper.c
> index 7dc79fa8a1f3..08df413efdf3 100644
> --- a/fs/netfs/read_helper.c
> +++ b/fs/netfs/read_helper.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void netfs_cache_read_terminated(void *priv, ssize_t transferred_or_error
>   */
>  static void netfs_read_from_cache(struct netfs_read_request *rreq,
>  				  struct netfs_read_subrequest *subreq,
> -				  bool seek_data)
> +				  enum netfs_read_from_hole read_hole)
>  {
>  	struct netfs_cache_resources *cres = &rreq->cache_resources;
>  	struct iov_iter iter;
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static void netfs_read_from_cache(struct netfs_read_request *rreq,
>  			subreq->start + subreq->transferred,
>  			subreq->len   - subreq->transferred);
>  
> -	cres->ops->read(cres, subreq->start, &iter, seek_data,
> +	cres->ops->read(cres, subreq->start, &iter, read_hole,
>  			netfs_cache_read_terminated, subreq);
>  }
>  
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void netfs_rreq_short_read(struct netfs_read_request *rreq,
>  	netfs_get_read_subrequest(subreq);
>  	atomic_inc(&rreq->nr_rd_ops);
>  	if (subreq->source == NETFS_READ_FROM_CACHE)
> -		netfs_read_from_cache(rreq, subreq, true);
> +		netfs_read_from_cache(rreq, subreq, NETFS_READ_HOLE_CLEAR);

Hi I'm not sure why NETFS_READ_HOLE_CLEAR style should be used in 'short
read' case.

Besides,

```
static void netfs_read_from_cache(struct netfs_read_request *rreq,
				  struct netfs_read_subrequest *subreq,
				  enum netfs_read_from_hole read_hole)
{
	struct netfs_cache_resources *cres = &rreq->cache_resources;
	struct iov_iter iter;

	netfs_stat(&netfs_n_rh_read);
	iov_iter_xarray(&iter, READ, &rreq->mapping->i_pages,
			subreq->start + subreq->transferred,
			subreq->len   - subreq->transferred);

	cres->ops->read(cres, subreq->start, &iter, read_hole,
			netfs_cache_read_terminated, subreq);
}
```

I'm not sure why 'subreq->start' is not incremented with
'subreq->transferred' when calling cres->ops->read() in 'short read' case.


>  	else
>  		netfs_read_from_server(rreq, subreq);
>  }
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static bool netfs_rreq_submit_slice(struct netfs_read_request *rreq,
>  		netfs_read_from_server(rreq, subreq);
>  		break;
>  	case NETFS_READ_FROM_CACHE:
> -		netfs_read_from_cache(rreq, subreq, false);
> +		netfs_read_from_cache(rreq, subreq, NETFS_READ_HOLE_IGNORE);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		BUG();




> diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h
> index 5a46fde65759..b46c39d98bbd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netfs.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,15 @@ struct netfs_read_request_ops {
>  	void (*cleanup)(struct address_space *mapping, void *netfs_priv);
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * How to handle reading from a hole.
> + */
> +enum netfs_read_from_hole {
> +	NETFS_READ_HOLE_IGNORE,
> +	NETFS_READ_HOLE_CLEAR,
> +	NETFS_READ_HOLE_FAIL,
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * Table of operations for access to a cache.  This is obtained by
>   * rreq->ops->begin_cache_operation().
> @@ -208,7 +217,7 @@ struct netfs_cache_ops {
>  	int (*read)(struct netfs_cache_resources *cres,
>  		    loff_t start_pos,
>  		    struct iov_iter *iter,
> -		    bool seek_data,
> +		    enum netfs_read_from_hole read_hole,
>  		    netfs_io_terminated_t term_func,
>  		    void *term_func_priv);
>  
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle