Patch "rxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer()" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Sun Dec 5 06:01:56 PST 2021
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
rxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer()
to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
rxrpc-fix-rxrpc_local-leak-in-rxrpc_lookup_peer.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable at vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From beacff50edbd6c9659a6f15fc7f6126909fade29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata at nutanix.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 04:16:08 +0000
Subject: rxrpc: Fix rxrpc_local leak in rxrpc_lookup_peer()
From: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata at nutanix.com>
commit beacff50edbd6c9659a6f15fc7f6126909fade29 upstream.
Need to call rxrpc_put_local() for peer candidate before kfree() as it
holds a ref to rxrpc_local.
[DH: v2: Changed to abstract the peer freeing code out into a function]
Fixes: 9ebeddef58c4 ("rxrpc: rxrpc_peer needs to hold a ref on the rxrpc_local record")
Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata at nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne at auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs at lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211121041608.133740-2-eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com/ # v1
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/rxrpc/peer_object.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
@@ -297,6 +297,12 @@ static struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_create_p
return peer;
}
+static void rxrpc_free_peer(struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
+{
+ rxrpc_put_local(peer->local);
+ kfree_rcu(peer, rcu);
+}
+
/*
* Set up a new incoming peer. There shouldn't be any other matching peers
* since we've already done a search in the list from the non-reentrant context
@@ -363,7 +369,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_lookup_peer(str
spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
if (peer)
- kfree(candidate);
+ rxrpc_free_peer(candidate);
else
peer = candidate;
}
@@ -418,8 +424,7 @@ static void __rxrpc_put_peer(struct rxrp
list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link);
spin_unlock_bh(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);
- rxrpc_put_local(peer->local);
- kfree_rcu(peer, rcu);
+ rxrpc_free_peer(peer);
}
/*
@@ -455,8 +460,7 @@ void rxrpc_put_peer_locked(struct rxrpc_
if (n == 0) {
hash_del_rcu(&peer->hash_link);
list_del_init(&peer->keepalive_link);
- rxrpc_put_local(peer->local);
- kfree_rcu(peer, rcu);
+ rxrpc_free_peer(peer);
}
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from eiichi.tsukata at nutanix.com are
queue-5.4/rxrpc-fix-rxrpc_local-leak-in-rxrpc_lookup_peer.patch
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list