[PATCH] net: rxrpc: mark expected switch fall-throughs

David Howells dhowells at redhat.com
Thu Oct 19 14:44:59 PDT 2017


Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva at embeddedor.com> wrote:

> > No.  Firstly, it should be 'F'; secondly, don't remove the blank line - it's
> > there for a reason.
> >
> 
> What is the reason?

Visual separation.

David



More information about the linux-afs mailing list