[PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache

David Howells dhowells at redhat.com
Tue Mar 8 05:02:28 PST 2016


David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com> wrote:

> Does it make sense to maintain a FIFO list of connections (though this would
> mean potentially taking a spinlock every time I get a packet)?

It occurs to me that only inactive connections would need to be on an LRU
list.  Any connection with packets or active calls to deal with wouldn't be on
the list.

David



More information about the linux-afs mailing list