[PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache
David Howells
dhowells at redhat.com
Tue Mar 8 05:02:28 PST 2016
David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com> wrote:
> Does it make sense to maintain a FIFO list of connections (though this would
> mean potentially taking a spinlock every time I get a packet)?
It occurs to me that only inactive connections would need to be on an LRU
list. Any connection with packets or active calls to deal with wouldn't be on
the list.
David
More information about the linux-afs
mailing list