ETAs for libusbx operability and first release?

[Pete Batard]

On 2012.01.31 16:01, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I already told you it was looking for 'Re:' in the Subject line.
>
> What part of that was hard to understand?

Obvioulsy I'm not familiar with having to do this, since I've been using 
reframing without hickups on every other mailing list I'm subscribed to.

I thought the list processor was looking for remnants of the original 
thread subject, not a "Re:".

Let me try that again.

Regards,

/Pete