device filtering support

[Pete Batard]

On 2012.02.04 14:23, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>> On 2012.02.04 01:25, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>>> However, Pete indicated that he would like to keep the
>>> standalone WinUSB backend, so that will keep a lot of
>>> duplicate codes inside the Windows backend.
>>
>> Please do not distort the facts according to the point you are trying to
>> make.
>
> Actually I am just stating a fact

You were using "like", which seemed pretty dismissive of my position, 
especially when you add the not-so-accurate threat of duplicated code 
and you don't provide any of the reasons I previously communicated to 
you or Travis as to why I want to keep support for standalone WinUSB.

I don't think it's a matter of me liking something better than something 
else. It's a matter of doing what we think is best for our users. If we 
can avoid adding a requirement for K, and it's easy (which it is), I 
think we should go for it because it'll benefit our users.

Regards,

/Pete