Nice-to-have fix for autogen.sh

[Segher Boessenkool]

>> I think we should switch our autogen.sh to use autoreconf; people
>> who do not like the run-configure-automatically will then of course
>> be more likely to run autoreconf by hand, and people who do want
>> to run configure can use autogen.sh .  Everyone happy :-)
>
> Something like this, right?
> http://urjtag.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=urjtag/ 
> urjtag;a=blob;f=urjtag/autogen.sh;hb=HEAD

Quite like that, yes.  I wouldn't use --symlink because we need
an actual copy of the installed files for the release tarballs,
but that's a detail.

>> But for 1.0.9 let's not switch yet.
>
> I agree. Other than the libtool fix and the "$@" fix, let's keep the
> status quo.

I really don't feel like breaking everything for everyone at the last
minute ;-)


Segher