4 new commits in master

[Michael Plante]

Pete Batard wrote:
>> I pointed to examples of forks that are divisive (and I could add more.
>> Hudson vs Jenkins, JavaScript vs JScript, that had to be reconciled to
>> great effort, though not exactly Open Source, etc.) as a proof that
>> forks are divisive by nature and require people to take side. To that,
>> you basically answered "No - not us". And you ask me to justify further?

Yes, I do.  I am unfamiliar with those new cases you've added, although I
have at least used kde and gnome.  I chose which one I liked, but I've never
coded for either.  So the analogy falls completely flat for me.



>> I wouldn't call looking at what the competition does and
>> borrowing/stealing their ideas "working with".

I do.


>> >>> Unsubscribe or not doesn't matter.
>> >
>> > Then start a new thread, or at least post it somewhere else within the
thread.  Don't reply to that point -- read in that context that was
misleading.
>>
>> I don't get what you mean.

It was very deep quoting and it is trimmed now.  It was there in its
entirety for awhile.  You can go back and reread it or not.


>> >>>> And Peter, for one, will never take our side.
>> >>>> So we lose his expertise.
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes. And when Hans Reiser allegedly killed his wife the Linux
>> >>> community lost his expertise.
>> >
>> > I'm sure Peter will love the comparison.  No one is preventing me from
passing messages back and forth.
>>
>> No one will prevent you.


My point is the comparison is silly because you are claiming that Hans
Reiser cannot communicate with the Linux community, directly or indirectly.
(I am unfamiliar with the rules he operates under, so I will take your word
for it.)  Peter at least has the indirect option open.


Regards,
Michael