[Libusbx-devel] doxygen and rebranding update

[Xiaofan Chen]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Pete Batard <pete at akeo.ie> wrote:
>>> The Doxygen file is not only API documentation, but also some other
>>> stuff.
>>
>> As explained above, while it most certainly can be used for more than
>> just APIs, I disagree with doing so, as I only anticipate duplicate and
>> syncproblems if we do.
>
> No

Oops, I did not finish typing the reply here. I meant to say
"No problem".

>> This being said, if anybody wants to send in patches to improve the
>> sources for doxygen or other stuff, feel free to do so. But as far as
>> I'm concerned, I'm not planning to spend more time on doxygen than what
>> I have done today - realistically, I just won't have time for that.
>>
>
> No problem. We can leave Doxygen as it is for 1.0.x. I am not
> saying the current Doxygen is bad -- on contrary, it is excellent.
> Daniel Drake did a superb job for libusb.
>



-- 
Xiaofan