[Libusbx-devel] libusbx v1.0.9-rc5 is now available

[Xiaofan Chen]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Michael Plante <michael.plante at gmail.com> wrote:
> Pete Batard wrote:
>>> By definition, someone who remains on an OS that is past EOL is making a
>>> deliberate choice of not being supported. As such, it wouldn't make much
>>> sense for us to taken on supporting them, even if there's still a
>>> significant volume of users.
>
>
> Some have repeatedly taken "not supported" to mean "refuse to accept
> patches".  "Not supported", as far as the OS goes, is different from
> "doesn't work", or they wouldn't have that user volume you mention.

I agree with you here. Not officially supported should not be
equal to "refused to accept patches".

On the other hand, the patches still need to be clean.


-- 
Xiaofan