[PATCH 0/2] Continue using generate_local_port() but fallback to kernel automatism

[Julien Courtat]

On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 14:58 +0200, Thomas Haller wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How about this? I don't feel well with changing behavior if it can be
>> avoided.
>> The downside of this approach is that the code is more complicated
>> then removing
>> generate_local_port() entirely.
>>
>>
>
> Merged the 2 patches (slightly modified) to master:
>
> https://github.com/thom311/libnl/commit/85b0038c8bdef96e8e8efe10622a8aebee174214
>
>
> Thomas

Hello,

Please excuse me for my very late answer, i just wanted to tell i tested 
this patch with my setup which requires a lot of ports opened per 
application, and it works well.

thanks for your patches

Tested-by: Julien Courtat <julien.courtat at 6wind.com>"

Julien