<html><body>
<p>Hi everyone...</p>
<p>I've migrated the repo from CVS to SVN way back then because of the first time I looked into 'cvs log' it made me barf.</p>
<p>About 15 months later we migrated citadel from SVN to GIT.</p>
<p>Clearly git is prefereable over SVN. Probably the sf.net git doesn't provide the neccesary infrastructure like the CI or bugtracker etc?</p>
<p>I'm all in for migrating.</p>
<p>Please make shure there is a last commit to SVN laying breadcrumbs to the new location.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Cheers, Willi</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri May 09 2014 08:26:32 EDT</span> <span>from "Allen Winter" <winter@kde.org> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: [Freeassociation-devel] Move to GitHub</span></div>
<div class="message_content"><tt>On Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:48:29 PM Daniel Corbe wrote:</tt><br />
<blockquote><tt>Allen Winter <winter@kde.org> writes:</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br />
<blockquote><tt>Howdy,</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt>I'm thinking we should migrate from Subversion at SourceForge to Git at GitHub.</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt>I'd rather be using git than subversion.</tt><br /> <tt>I'd like be able to have git feature branches where people can work on bigger features.</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt>And a really big thing I want is CI, and GitHub projects can leverage the travis-ci.org system.</tt><br /> <tt>Maybe sourceforge has a free CI system, but I can't find such a thing.</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt>Comments about moving from SourceForget to GitHub?</tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt></tt></blockquote>
<tt>You realize that git has an SVN module, right?</tt><br /> <tt></tt></blockquote>
<tt>Sure and I considered that. but only helps a little.</tt><br /> <tt>It's not just git I want (full featured git), but gitHub so I can use their CI.</tt><br /> </div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>